Please be honest with me.
I'm an unpublished children's novelist, working with a web designer who strongly advises putting my first novel on the website he's designing for me (the ms is complete; I'm finalizing the edits and was planning to shop it around to agents). His (kind and thoughtful) argument is that traditional publishing is dying and it's better to go directly to readers. I'm intrigued and suspicious.
Am I a literary whore for considering doing this? Does this count as "self publishing" if I simply put it out on the web? Does it diminish my credibility as an upstanding and professional author? Might it show the big publishing houses what kind of interest is out there (prompting them to offer me a contract)?
My published friend (who's also a musician) just emailed me these comments, which seem very valid (I've underlined my favorite line):
Tags:
In my opinion, there is no good and bad way, you just have to do what works for you. I am self published via POD, first Authorhouse and now Createspace for my second book. As a Nigerian romance novelist, I write for a niche audience and so it made sense. I also had lots of free time and buckets of motivation. I am successful today cos it worked out for me.
So while I'll mention it, it won't be the first option I'll give anyone. Traditional publishing is still easier if not as commercially lucrative in the long run(let me qualify that by saying, well you might get a great deal right out the door even if it's not very common). The decision is up to you.
Permalink Reply by Rev. LaWaughn Rouse on March 11, 2011 at 9:55am RevLa,
Thanks for your reply. I like your heart/chutzpah.
Permalink Reply by Rev. LaWaughn Rouse on March 11, 2011 at 12:05pm
Valorie Grace Hallinan replied to the discussion 'What did you blog about today?' in the group Bloggers: Let's Make It Work!
April Eberhardt commented on the blog post 'The Many Paths to Publishing—Which One’s Right for You?'© 2013 Created by Kamy Wicoff.
