Tags: commentary, creative, essays, non-fiction, personal, social
Permalink Reply by Kelly Garriott Waite on July 15, 2011 at 12:03pm
Permalink Reply by Laura G Owens on July 15, 2011 at 1:07pm Thanks Kelly : )
I'm retracting my Funny Girls essay critique request. I don't feel it's my best work and, and..... LOL
As par for the course, most of my time lately is dedicated to writing articles, and now my website, Words for Empowered Living: laura-owens.com. My blog has a few essays, opinions: http://lauragowens.wordpress.com/
I did submit an essay to It's All in Her Head for a compilation book about women working with mental health issues. My essay on post-partum depression was selected as a finalist. I'm still waiting for the final word.
I appreciate the info on essay markets. I subscribe to CNF; a fine publication, and yes the creme de la creme for essays, IMO.
Thank you again : )
Laura
I've been thinking about this posting for a few days, trying to decide whether or not I had two cents to add. The essay is my love. Montaigne, Emerson, Samuel Johnson, Thomas Friedman, Anne LaMott are my essay heroes. I understand well the whole concern about the CNF direction of this art form. I spent so many years of my life as an academic and felt most comfortable writing pieces that dealt with facts and footnotes and leading from premise to conclusion one logical transition at a time.
When I looked at my favorite academic writers, I saw that what they all had in common was they were whizzes at weaving stories in among the footnotes. Then when I started reading contemporary essayists like Bill Bryson and Annie Dillard I found that they were absolute whizzes at weaving science and history and politics in among their stories. And all of these writers, academic or non-academic had absolutely personal styles and unique voices. And they all told stories. Story-telling adds what Aristotle called the "emotional appeal." Stories are how readers connect the unfamiliar (the point a writer is making) to the familiar (their own lives). Stories make readers invested in a piece.
When I left academic life I knew I wanted to keep writing, but who outside of the university wanted to hear about French rhetorical theorists or Aristotle on ethics? So to keep writing I had to find a new style and a new voice. So I started back to reading and reading and reading all kinds of things until I found writers doing what I wanted to do. I do feel the pressure of the CNF/New Yorker style. It's so prevalent right now, which makes it seem so boring. So many pieces seem to sound the same to me in the literary journals. It's not me, and I can't write to fit the trend. So I'm still trying to figure out the best place to send the essays that I currently am working on.
My suggestion is to read, read, and read from a wide variety of non-fiction (and fiction) sources. Figure out what your favorite writers do that engage you and then figure out how you can use that technique yourself. In your writing journal trying copying their styles. Try out the topics or techniques or those you dislike, but find ways to add your own twist. Write your message in haiku. Even if you don't feel comfortable in other genres or other versions of essays, experiment. The most difficult part of non-academic writing was to start using "I." Figure out what is hard and strange for you, then do it deliberately. Nobody has to see it. Baseball players do pilates, not because they want to be dancers but because it works new muscles and allows them to do their sport better.
Does any of this make sense? Sorry I went on for so long.
Permalink Reply by Laura G Owens on July 23, 2011 at 2:45pm Hi Julie
Yes it does make sense thank you.
I'm so tied into my new website right now that the essay and creative side of me is temporarily on hold, but not at the expense of reading and exploring great essayists.
I just read a piece by Lee Gutkind (editor of CNF) about how important it is for academics to learn to tell a story and how storytellers and essayists should learn to provide more expert information, to offer a sturdy posit with research and support for their story.
"If creative writers are willing to reach past their coming-of-age memoirs and the types of personal narratives that tend to predominate in creative writing workshops, they can turn themselves into experts through research and study, and produce narratives that teach readers about science or architecture or medicine or...anything, really." Lee Gutkind
I find this encouraging. I have a strong interest and background in research (Psych major years back). My writing niche in the commercial world (Words for Empowered Living, laura-owens.com) spans well-being, natural health, psychology, social trends and motherhood. These interests, in addition to of course just living life, inform my essays. Much of my work requires I do research and become a lay expert; Gutkind mentions how much of the CNF today is "brainy" but not necessarily from an actual expert.
I've long struggled with telling anecdotal stories in a manner that captures the reader, although I've improved and my voice and memory of events now flows more easily. Writing dialogue however, feels somewhat contrived for me, like I must pull out a conversation, that I must ad lib, fill in, create from memory what may be far from the actual dialogue that occurred say, between my teen daughter, my husband etc. I remember the FEELING but not the actual exchange.
My essays seem to want to inform, to teach, to state my feelings and opinions, observations and insights and then make a social commentary to tie it all together. This approach might be my lack of CNF experience or just who I am; I'm not sure. I will work on my storytelling skills because a great storyteller who can also inform is likely where I want to be.
Barbara Kingsolver informs and educates her readers beautifully in her essays as she comments on eco issues, conservation, population control as does Carl Hiassen although he is mostly fiction.
I'm reading Freedom by Franzen and while again, this is fiction, his detailed and nuanced (down to highly astute insights about humans today), his social commentary on modern day suburnites,the environmental destruction through mountain top removal for coal mining, population issues, generation y, z, (whoever's) attitude, the corporate conscience disguised by environmentalists who sell out, our culture of narcissism, is brilliant. I hope I'm absorbing a style all my own, but one that is informed by the great essays.
Anne Lamott is my favorite essayist so far, and she doesn't seem to offer lots of dialogue or present expert information, more she offers anecdotes, stories, her opinion and then reflects (mostly with humor). THAT's what I enjoy writing the most - "Here's my life, here's how I feel, here's my commentary." She does it without sounding acerbic or preachy, I'm working on that. When "you should" is an undertone, the reader is turned off I believe.
Laura
Permalink Reply by Nichole L. Reber on September 25, 2011 at 12:52pm I'd like to see some of your writing, if you're open to it. If you want a critique, I'll give it. If you want no feedback, that's OK too.
I have a feeling your essays would ring well in my ears.
Cheers!
Permalink Reply by Laura G Owens on September 25, 2011 at 1:06pm Well, thank you Nichole that's a nice thing to say :)
I so rarely write essays now, having little time with my websites and online articles.
When I don't shy away from essays, they take me weeks. I submitted to It's All In Her Head, a compilation of essays from women who battled and triumphed over mental illness. Mine was about post-partum depression. I was a finalist but just this summer, got cut with praise (translation - yours was good Laura, but not good enough). Very disappointing. I plan to submit it to other publications eventually.
I'd love for you to take a look at it, and please feel free to critique it, or not, either is fine. I"ll also post a blog I'm writing at this moment. As par for my "blogs", sometimes my posts become essay-like. I'll finish up and post both today.
Laura
Permalink Reply by Nichole L. Reber on September 25, 2011 at 1:26pm This is the thing that sucks with literary work: you can only submit it to one place at a time. I decided a while ago to eschew that rule with journalism. It's not only unfair for publishers to expect us to take possibly as year out of our lives between submissions and waiting times, it's also an anomaly. For instance, when applying for jobs, is one company the only one you're applying to? No, even if you get to the third tier of interviews you can opt to go with another company, eh?
Now I'm going to contradict myself; I'm just entering this field (though I've had two essays published already) and don't want to get a bad name with any single publication that I'm aiming for. Therefore I will wait perhaps a couple weeks for each submission. If it takes them more then that...well....we'll see.
Yes, I'll read your piece and offer a critique. I'm working on another draft of one of my essays and would like your reciprocity. Having briefly perused your blog and generally liking the subjects I've seen, I'm eager to read your essay.
You can email me your essay at Nichole@ArchitectureTravelWriter.com
Cheers!
NLR
Permalink Reply by Laura G Owens on September 25, 2011 at 1:38pm I know many publications e and print, allow concurrent submissions but because this was for a book, I assumed the submission was proprietary. Selfishly I admit, I"m not in love with critiquing others' work but I"m happy to give you my thoughts or overall sense, as reciprocity is the right thing to do : ) Did you have a deadline? Can it be week after next?
I like your website, and was immediately struck by the visuals and the variety of your topics. I write natural health, well-being & psychology, mind-body. Self-empowerment topics inform almost all my work, literary and otherwise.
All the best,
Laura
Permalink Reply by Nichole L. Reber on September 25, 2011 at 1:57pm Yeah, the chapter submission does make a difference.
Actually I don't really need to know how people feel about this current essay. Some 10 people have already looked at it, so that part's clear.
You know how some pieces are like lovers who haven't gotten the clue they've overstayed their welcome? This essay is becoming like that. I will have it submitted by the end of this week, if not the middle. There is, after all, another essay and a couple of journalistic articles on its heels.
Thanks for the compliment on my blog.
Cheers and luck!
Permalink Reply by Laura G Owens on September 25, 2011 at 2:59pm What a great metaphor Nichole, and so true! I overstayed many essays in the past, when I used to write them consistently, bored to death by the monotony of re-reading myself for the 20th time.
Now, I'm like the lover who chooses to avoid love, keeping essay rejection at arm's length, selectively choosing to spend ANY time on them (out of time limitation AND losing my love of the process).
I use blogging to express now, but every so often venture the essay..... I sense this might be a later in life world for me rather than a "do or die" as I once deemed literary writing. I"ve been published, had some "oh so close buts," an honorable mention, but still, after (hand on brow) the time commitment and rejection, I'm a bit essay-jumpy now.
Laura
Lizzie Eldridge commented on the blog post '[What's Next?] What Are You Looking At?'© 2013 Created by Kamy Wicoff.
