Poetry works best when it helps us see and hear the world anew. Through concise use of vivid languages and sensory images, we can bring our poetry alive, opening it up to new dimensions. "Language can do what it can't say," William Stafford said, and nothing is more true of powerful poetry. By tilting how we usually write just a wee bit, we can make sparks to illuminate the writings' hidden possibilities. Here are some approaches you can test-drive in your poetry:
Caryn Mirriam-Goldberg, guest-editing this site this week, has been writing poetry since she was 14. She is the poet laureate of Kansas and author of four collections and editor of four anthologies of poetry.
Comment
Comment by Janet McAdams on April 15, 2012 at 6:49am Terrific advice. I'm going to share your post with my students.
I particularly like - and relate to - "last line first." In some recent poems I have seen that the last line really works best as the first line! And that makes it easier to see how to "free the sled dogs,'' too. I think "opening the doors" is one of the biggest challenges, which, when done, results in the most successful poems. Thanks for your five ways of focusing on revision!
Thank you so much, Gerda for what you say about the journey. Of course I agree! Thanks for commenting, Patricia. Clene, thanks for sharing your experience, and I think it's a lifelong art to do gut-check on the writing, and develop our critical sense about what works and what needs work.
Caryn:
Thank you for you wise words that I take to heart. As a emerging poet fortunate to be a member of a writing group your advice captures the essence of the why, how, what, where and when in opening up and closing many doors on our journey. Wishing you the best. Take care.
Comment by Patricia A. McGoldrick on April 11, 2012 at 11:27am
Comment by Clene` S. Elder on April 9, 2012 at 10:11pm First and far most a big "Thank you."
I wrote poems for leisure before I delved into any other genre. During my high school and college careers, I remember feeling like my instructors couldn't provide me with any solid feedback regarding my poems. They would always write vague responses like “Great job”, followed by “great use of imagery” or “colorful use of language.” In response, I would always think, “What does this really mean?” I felt like perhaps they didn’t read it or, maybe they did know how to digest it. Or, maybe I was horrible!
Beyond the traditional elements of poetry, I learned everything I know about the “freedom” of poetry and the freedom of writing poetry from other poets – not from the classroom!
Your article took me back to the days where I felt lost in a sea of meaningless instructor feedback – in a good way. With this piece, here fifteen years after the fact, I feel like I do not need to make a creative sacrifice in order to write a good poem. You gave me “creative guidance” and broke it down into five different approaches to revision.
Many poets I know personally write from a place of what I call “gut-check.” They are lead by an experience or an emotion in their respective “guts”, assess it (review the depth of such a feeling/experience) and write about it! Period. Thereafter, the chips kind of fall where they may… Then they “clean it up.” My process is very similar.
But now, thanks to you, I have perspective. :-)
Judith Newton commented on the group 'SWP Authors!'© 2013 Created by Kamy Wicoff.

You need to be a member of She Writes to add comments!
Join She Writes