Since we live in a world that is still very patriarchal, at all levels and in evident and hidden ways, it's not surprising that women's books are not as well received as they should be. Part of the problem is institutional: men are more likely to land in the powerful positions that determine taste and popularity. They are more likely to edit the popular and classroom anthologies, to sit on committees that give prizes, to run publishing houses, to run state and federal agencies and foundations, and to write criticism in high circulation publications. That's not to say women aren't present in those positions, but the proportions are important, because they lead to a certain cultural drift and slant. Part of the problem lies with writers and critics. Given that more literary criticism is written by men, the topics that seem important to men will be given closer and more positive attention. As Virgil told us long ago, it's more important to write about war than to write about love (or agriculture). So even though some women write about "masculine" topics now, most women writers are concerned more with the domestic and interpersonal than the political, military and foreign. Their writing might be of a very high order, but male critics will read it as less serious and important. What should we do? Go on integrating our professional and personal lives in novel ways that always need to be invented; write about what we think is important; support each other; make "masculine" bias a matter of public reflection; and stay optimistic.
You need to be a member of She Writes to add comments!
Join She Writes