If you’ve read that feminist classic, “The Second Sex,” in English, you’ve been reading a faulty translation that distorted Simone de Beauvoir’s message. Now you can finally read a new translation that is far more faithful to the French author’s original intent—the fruit of a long struggle by feminist scholars.

The new translation, by Americans Constance Borde and Sheila Malovany-Chevallier, has just been released in England by Jonathan Cape, which owns the British rights. It will be published in the U.S. this April by Knopf, which owns the American rights.

How did we get such a weak translation? It was the work of a zoologist, chosen for his expertise in human sexual reproduction. Comically, when Blanche Knopf, the wife of publisher Alfred Knopf, went to France to buy the rights to the sensational 1949 bestseller, she assumed it was a sex manual like the Kinsey Report. After all it had “sex” in the title.

For the American translation, who else to ask but a man who reviewed sex books for the Herald Tribune? That’s how we got Howard Madison Parshley, a retired professor with only high school and college French, as the translator in 1953. And a man whose interpretation was often clouded by the stereotyped sex roles firmly planted in the 1950s.

For years, feminist philosophers and Beauvoir scholars tried to persuade Knopf that it was time to do a new translation, as I reported in the New York Times in 2004. They pointed out that there were translation errors and omissions on almost every page. In some cases, Parshley’s translation directly contradicted Beauvoir’s meaning. And Parshley sprinkled the text with references to “feminine nature,” which would have been anathema to Beauvoir.

Beauvoir had received rigorous training as a philosopher. But Parshley was unfamiliar with Beauvoir’s philosophical terminology and even less familiar with the thinking of the new existentialist circle where Beauvoir was prominent.

Some of his translations converted serious philosophical terms that are familiar to us today into inanities. Discussions of the woman as “Subject” got turned into discussions of women’s overly subjective-- i.e. emotional, non-rational-- nature.

Parshley also cut up to 20 percent of the text, according to Cape, slashing descriptions of powerful women in history. For the first time, this new translation restores all the cuts. It was a thrill to pick up this volume and finally read about Renaissance women who led 3,000 female troops to defend their city of Siena.

Why did it take so long to get a new translation? One has to wonder if the fact that Beauvoir was a woman—and best known to most Americans as the girlfriend of Sartre—meant that few took her seriously as a philosopher. Yet reading the two thinkers side-by-side today, I’d wager that Beauvoir has a more enduring message than Sartre. It remains to be seen whether this relatively straightforward translation will meet the demands of feminist scholars who want Beauvoir restored to her rightful place as a serious philosopher.

It was largely due to the persistence of a very determined editor at Beauvoir’s French publisher Gallimard, Anne-Solange Noble, that we have a new translation. She persuaded a young editor at Cape that a new, accurate version was needed. Once Cape was on board, Knopf, which is under the same Random House corporate roof, agreed to share expenses and bring out the American edition.

A recent article in Le Monde describes Cape mysteriously as having cold feet-- bringing out barely 5,000 copies for the first printing. Perhaps publishers still need to be convinced there’s a demand for the new version of this book, which has sold more than a million copies since its first printing in English and remains essential reading in college women’s studies courses.

How different will Beauvoir’s message be in this new version? For one thing, you’ll find her treatment of motherhood—which some criticize as cold-- more sympathetic than in the old translation. Parshley had Beauvoir saying that in spite of convenient nurseries, having a child was enough to “paralyze a woman entirely.” It was one of his more egregious translation errors and a particularly odd one considering that day care would have been scarce to non-existent in France at the time.

The new translation has it right: “[G]iven the lack of well-organized day nurseries and kindergartens, even one child is enough to entirely paralyze a woman’s activities,” Beauvoir writes in a passage on the difficulties of maintaining a professional life along with motherhood. Sound familiar?

Some Beauvoir experts say it’s these kinds of translation glitches that make so many readers think of Beauvoir as hostile to motherhood. Others, including those who read her in French, may still think of her that way.

But at least now we’re all on the same page.

Views: 58


You need to be a member of She Writes to add comments!

Join She Writes

Comment by Kelli Swearingen on December 17, 2009 at 12:29pm
Yes! This is going on my wish list.
Comment by Marcia Fine on December 15, 2009 at 5:38pm
Loved this! My father gave me a copy of this book when i was in my late teens. Prescient man who unleased another feminist in the world. I'd like to read the new translation!
marcia Fine
Comment by Kamy Wicoff on December 15, 2009 at 10:31am
I love this post Sarah -- I remember your NYT piece so clearly and it really made me desperate for the new translation, as Beauvoir, and that book, is one of my most important touchstones. I am definitely going to buy the new translation on Friday as part of my Holiday Book Buying effort, and I hope lots of other She Writers honor one of our greatest thinkers and philosophers by doing the same.
Comment by Kirsten Rue on December 14, 2009 at 1:07pm
I am on my last 100 pages of this behemoth, and *now* there's a new translation?! Bad timing. I'm glad this cause has been taken up, and that a more faithful version will now be released in English. Nevertheless, the book has already changed my life. There are some things so powerful, they slice through an inept translation. On top of that, I have to say I've gained a secret enjoyment from reading my paperback 70's copy with "The Classic Manifesto of the Liberated Woman!" printed on the cover.
Comment by Marilyn Yalom on December 13, 2009 at 6:49pm
The translators, Connie and Sheila, are good friends I see twice a year in Paris. Americans who have lived in Paris for over 30 years, they make a great team. They've both taught at Science Po and have written other books together (mainly cookbooks). I've invited them to speak at Stanford on "The Second Sex" on April 8, 4-6.. Anyone in the Bay area (or elsewhere) who wants to come to the Humanities Center on that day is welcome to attend what will undoubtedly be a terrific talk.

Cheers, Marilyn


Latest Activity

ethel zylstra posted a blog post

The Right Exercise Program For Me?

Well, this is a question that every person out there wants answered. Of course, in order for you to answer this particular question you’re going to want to know exactly kind of results you’re looking for from exercising for example, if you’re trying…See More
15 minutes ago
Sonja Benskin Mesher posted a blog post

. a distant sound .

i think i heard a night jarup the valley here. it was a quiet night exceptfor that. we have the window open now. sbm.See More
49 minutes ago
Ansley Hughes left a comment for Ansley Hughes
2 hours ago
Ansley Hughes left a comment for Ansley Hughes
2 hours ago




© 2016   Created by Kamy Wicoff.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service