
Here's something that I think will interest many of the women writers in this forum. I think
this blog post from the Guardian speaks directly to the problem we've all been talking about, worrying about: the literary clout of women's writers.
Here's a snippet: "There's a great deal of pleasure in publishing, particularly in writing by women, but it's not found on prize lists. That's because this type of book is almost invariably marketed as "women's fiction", often clad in a bright pink cover and bearing an image of a shoe or a cupcake on the front. These books may catch the eyes of readers in Waterstone's (as reflected in the bestseller lists), but their categorisation appears to be a dealbreaker when it comes to literary prizes."
It's about marketing and how that marketing affects how the books are perceived--by readers, by reviewers, and apparently, even by editors (many of them women) deciding whether to nominate their female authors for book prizes. Or not.
Some of you might remember that I talked about this during the "No Women on the PW List" discussion.
You need to be a member of She Writes to add comments!
Join She Writes